Wednesday, 4 February 2026

Is an AI Bubble Next? Comparing Today's Tech Boom to the 2008 Financial Crisis

Recent analyses suggest a potential economic downturn, possibly more severe than the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis, driven by the overvaluation of leading technology companies, often dubbed the "Magnificent Seven," and speculative investments in artificial intelligence (AI). 

Since the launch of ChatGPT in late 2022, the S&P 500 has surged about 90%, with most gains driven by a small group of AI-linked technology giants, including Microsoft, Apple, Alphabet, Nvidia, and major data-center operators.

Nvidia has emerged as the sector’s standout, evolving from a gaming chipmaker into a central supplier of AI infrastructure and approaching record-breaking market valuations. However, critics warn that much of the investment flowing into AI companies is being recycled within the sector itself, creating a tightly interconnected financial system that could amplify risks if sentiment shifts.

This perspective is underscored by concerns from industry leaders, including CEOs of major tech firms, who hint at the fragility of current market valuations and the potential for widespread economic fallout.

High-profile investors have also entered the debate. Michael Burry, known for predicting the 2008 financial crisis, has publicly bet against the AI boom, arguing that extreme capital concentration often precedes major downturns. His warnings have prompted some fund managers to reduce exposure to technology stocks. Critics, however, note that several of Burry’s post-2008 predictions did not come true.

Regulators and analysts also have raised red flags. The Bank of England has cautioned that AI-related stocks may be overvalued, while media reports highlight soaring executive and researcher compensation as a sign of overheating. Despite massive funding, key players such as OpenAI are not yet profitable.
 

Echoes of the Subprime Meltdown 


The 2008 subprime crisis serves as a critical precedent for understanding the current anxieties. At its core, the subprime crisis was fueled by an immense creation of fictitious capital within the U.S. real estate market. This involved inflated property values, often detached from their intrinsic worth, and a pervasive system of securitization. 

The Subprime Mechanism: 

  • Fictitious Capital: The housing bubble led to assets being priced unrealistically. 
  • Securitization (CDOs): Mortgage-backed securities, known as Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs), were widely distributed globally. These instruments, similar to Brazil's Real Estate Receivable Certificates (CRIs), allowed banks to offload risk by selling debt to investment funds worldwide. 
  • Excess Liquidity and Risky Lending: An abundance of capital in the financial system led banks to extend credit to increasingly unqualified borrowers, including those with no ability to repay, in pursuit of higher returns. This was rationalized by a booming market where property values and rents were consistently rising, seemingly ensuring repayment. 
  • Bubble Burst: The unsustainable rise in property prices eventually led to a saturation point, with properties becoming vacant and rents failing to cover mortgage payments. Defaults surged, leading to foreclosures and a rapid decline in property values as seized assets flooded the market. 
  • Global Contagion: The failure of CDOs caused investment funds holding these securities to lose massive value, triggering a liquidity crisis. Investors rushed to redeem funds, forcing asset liquidations across various markets (stocks, bonds), creating a domino effect that crippled the global financial system. 

The Current AI and Tech Bubble Today, concerns center on the Magnificent Seven (The largest tech companies in the S&P 500) which disproportionately drive market growth. The AI sector, in particular, is seen as a new locus of fictitious capital formation. Despite massive investments, AI technologies are not yet generating sufficient revenue to justify their soaring valuations, drawing parallels to the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s. 

Industry figures, such as Microsoft's CEO and Sam Altman (OpenAI), have openly acknowledged the existence of this bubble, even suggesting that government intervention might be necessary should it burst. This indicates an awareness within the industry that current valuations are unreal and predicated on future cash flows that may not materialize for many companies. 

Factors Contributing to the Current Bubble: 

  • Unjustified Valuations: Companies like Palantir, trading at 116 times revenue, exemplify valuations detached from fundamental asset value, which theoretically should be based on the ability to generate future cash flow. 
  • Passive ETF Management: Over half of the capital entering the U.S. stock market is managed passively through algorithms that automatically buy index proportions. This mechanism artificially inflates the prices of larger companies, with studies suggesting that Apple's price, for instance, was inflated by 23% due to these passive flows alone. 
  • Baby Boomer Effect: The impending retirement of the baby boomer generation is expected to lead to significant withdrawals from investment funds, potentially reversing the positive inflow trends and exacerbating market instability. 

Potential Impact of a Bursting Bubble 


Should this bubble burst, the consequences are projected to be severe and systemic. The disappearance of wealth would lead to a sharp reduction in consumer spending and overall economic activity. Assets, widely used as collateral throughout the financial system, would trigger cascading losses, leading to a profound liquidity crisis and a halt in money circulation. 

Historically, such crises result in the failure of smaller businesses, the contraction of medium-sized enterprises, and the opportunistic acquisition of undervalued assets by larger entities. This process invariably leads to a further concentration of wealth among the already rich and an expansion of poverty, illustrating a cyclical aspect of capitalism where crises of overproduction of fictitious capital are periodically resolved through its destruction.

Analysts also point to broader consequences, including environmental concerns tied to the rapid expansion of energy-intensive data centers

For now, experts agree on one point: bubbles are only confirmed after they burst, but the warning signs are becoming harder to ignore.


Tuesday, 3 February 2026

Cost of Living in Brazil in 2026: A Practical Guide for Expats

São Paulo, Brazil — Anyone planning to live in Brazil in 2026 should be prepared for a country that combines economic stability with relatively high everyday costs. While inflation is easing and interest rates are expected to decline, the cost of living remains a key factor for expatriates considering relocation or long-term residence.

This report breaks down what expats need to know about inflation, housing, income, and daily expenses in Brazil in 2026, based on official data and market expectations.

Inflation in Brazil: What Expats Should Expect in 2026

According to projections compiled by the Central Bank of Brazil’s Focus Report, consumer inflation (IPCA) is expected to remain close to 4.0% in 2026, near the upper limit of the official inflation target range.

For expats, this means that prices for essentials — including groceries, utilities, transportation, and personal services — are likely to continue rising, though at a slower and more predictable pace than in previous years. Inflation is no longer accelerating, but it is still high enough to affect monthly budgets.

Interest Rates and the Cost of Credit

Brazil continues to operate with one of the highest interest rates in the world. After ending 2025 with the Selic rate at 15%, economists expect gradual cuts throughout 2026, with the benchmark rate likely to finish the year between 12.0% and 12.25%.

For expatriates, this has direct implications:

  • Mortgages and personal loans remain expensive

  • Credit card interest rates are extremely high

  • Financing property or vehicles locally can be costly

Many expats rely on foreign savings or international financing to avoid Brazil’s high domestic borrowing costs.

Housing Costs: Rent and Property Prices

Housing remains the largest expense for most expats living in Brazil’s major cities such as São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Brasília, and Florianópolis.

Market projections indicate that housing prices and rents may rise between 6% and 10% in nominal terms in 2026, driven by:

  • Limited housing supply in prime neighborhoods

  • Inflation-adjusted rent contracts

  • Strong demand in urban centers

Expats renting in desirable areas should expect housing to consume a significant share of their monthly income, particularly in cities with strong job markets or tourist appeal.

Monthly Cost of Living in Brazil for Expats

While official government agencies do not publish a single “cost of living” figure, widely used private estimates suggest the following averages:

  • Single expat: around US$19,000–20,000 per year

  • Family of four: over US$40,000 per year, depending on lifestyle and city

  • In local currency, monthly expenses for a middle-class family in large cities can exceed R$13,000

These figures typically include housing, food, transportation, utilities, healthcare, and leisure, but exclude international school tuition, which can significantly raise costs for families.

Income, Jobs, and Purchasing Power

Brazil’s economy is expected to grow by 1.7% to 1.8% in 2026, reflecting modest but stable expansion. Analysts project real household income growth of close to 4%, supported by a relatively strong labor market.

For expats earning in foreign currency — such as US dollars or euros — Brazil can remain attractive, especially if the exchange rate stays around R$5.50 per US dollar. However, those paid in local currency may still feel pressure from high prices in housing and services.

Fiscal Risks and Long-Term Outlook

Brazil’s fiscal situation continues to influence the cost of living. Public debt is expected to remain above 70% of GDP, limiting the government’s ability to stimulate the economy without increasing inflation or interest rates.

For expats, this reinforces a key reality:
Brazil in 2026 is economically stable, but structurally expensive, particularly for services and credit.

Bottom Line: Is Brazil Affordable for Expats in 2026?

Brazil offers a high quality of life, diverse cities, and a vibrant culture — but affordability depends heavily on income source and location.

Key takeaways for expats:

  • Inflation is stable but still noticeable

  • Interest rates remain high

  • Housing is the main cost pressure

  • Foreign-currency earners are better positioned

  • Careful budgeting is essential

For expats planning a move in 2026, Brazil remains an attractive destination — but not a low-cost one.

Petrobras (PETR3; PETR4) Production Soars 7.6% in December, Driven by Pre-Salt

Petrobras reported a strong rise in oil and natural gas production in December, with output climbing 7.6% month over month to 3.218 million barrels of oil equivalent per day (boed), driven largely by pre-salt fields. Oil production rose 7.2% to 2.459 million barrels per day, while natural gas output increased 8.8%, according to Brazil’s oil regulator ANP.

For full-year 2025, Brazil set a new production record, with total oil and gas output reaching 4.897 million boed, up 12.7% versus 2023. Petrobras, responsible for nearly 90% of national production, benefited from the pre-salt layer, which accounted for almost 80% of total output.

Despite the strong operational performance, Petrobras shares faced mixed assessments from financial institutions. Bradesco BBI downgraded the stock to neutral, citing limited upside after a sharp rally and weak fundamentals supporting global oil prices amid rising supply. BTG Pactual also maintained a neutral stance, warning that dividends may fall short of expectations due to higher capital expenditures and non-recurring cash outflows.

Goldman Sachs, however, reiterated a buy recommendation, highlighting attractive medium-term dividend yields and potential political catalysts tied to Brazil’s electoral cycle.

Petrobras shares declined during the session as Brent crude fell around 5% following signs of easing geopolitical tensions between the United States and Iran, reinforcing concerns over global oil oversupply. The drop occurred despite Brazil announcing record oil production levels for 2025.

Beyond short-term market volatility, Petrobras drew attention for the scale of its proven reserves, estimated at 12.1 billion barrels of oil equivalent. Analysts note that the company continues to replace production with new discoveries, underscoring operational efficiency. While theoretical valuations suggest reserves alone could justify a much higher share price, investors continue to apply a discount reflecting oil price volatility and governance risks linked to Petrobras’s state-controlled status.

Is an AI Bubble Next? Comparing Today's Tech Boom to the 2008 Financial Crisis

Recent analyses suggest a potential economic downturn, possibly more severe than the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis, driven by the overvaluat...