The common belief that Brazilian workers display "low productivity" actually shows incorrect judgment of their work efficiency. Brazilian workers typically work longer hours than workers in wealthier countries but productivity statistics measure their output according to actual produced value instead of their work dedication. International comparisons show Brazil maintains lower productivity levels because its economy focuses on commodities and basic products which deliver lower market worth.
The "Belgian Beer Paradox" which economist Paulo Gala explained demonstrates how this distortion works. Belgian brewery workers, for example, seem to work with greater efficiency than Brazilian workers because they produce beer products which businesses sell at higher prices through premium brand marketing.
Belgian beer, often sold as a premium product with strong branding, reputation, and differentiation, commands a much higher price than its Brazilian counterpart. Consequently, the 'added value' generated by a Belgian brewery worker is significantly higher. The productivity indicator, in this instance, captures price and product complexity, not merely technical efficiency or physical output.
In short, it is much more expensive to produce beer in Belgium, where wages are much higher than in Brazil, which, in turn, leads producers to mechanize their production as much as possible.
The chemical industry experiences similar effects because advanced economies manufacture specialized pharmaceuticals and high-tech chemicals which create higher market value products. This situation reflects the production of highly specialized, patented pharmaceuticals and fine chemicals with immense technological content and market pricing power in advanced economies. Brazil, in contrast, often focuses on basic, intermediate, and petrochemical derivatives with lower added value.
Wage structures together with automation systems and capital expenses form another essential structural component. High-income economies face a labor situation where companies need to spend money on automation because they must pay high wages which leads to increased worker productivity and advanced technology development. The Brazilian economy depends on low-value production because its current wage levels and high capital costs create reduced automation incentives.
Economists like Paulo Gala and João Saboia state that the real challenge facing Brazil emerges from its need to develop higher levels of productivity instead of focusing on employee work performance. The country needs to establish technological improvements together with industrial development programs which will help it achieve higher productivity results for its global value chain operations.
The current debate relates to Brazilian minimum wage discussions which will reach their 90th anniversary since the 1930s establishment of the wage law. The minimum wage system according to economist João Saboia remains suitable for Brazil because it aligns with the country's productivity level yet Brazil faces fundamental structural challenges which include stagnant productivity levels and reduced investment activities and elevated interest rates and an aging population.
The country needs to achieve two goals for its long-term economic growth which include increasing productivity through technological progress and expanding high-value production and advancing solutions for income distribution problems through social policy measures. The Brazilian minimum wage is not the problem; compared to other countries, it is low.
In addition to this fact, the Centro de Estudos Sindicais e de Economia do Trabalho (Cesit) published a study which shows that Brazil will create millions of new jobs through increased productivity after decreasing the legal workweek from 44 hours to 36 hours.
The Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp) research center produced a document which shows that the research predicts the policy will lead to 4 to 5 million new jobs while increasing productivity by approximately 4 percent. The study aims to inform the ongoing debate in Brazil over working hours and labor reforms.
The economist Marilane Teixeira states that industries which operate with high employee requirements need to create new work schedules while bringing on new workers to support reduced employee work times.
Teixeira explained that businesses need to bring on additional staff because their operations continue throughout the week.
The study shows that people in Brazil work more hours than people in other countries. Researchers found that around 21 million workers exceed the 44-hour weekly limit established by Brazil’s Consolidação das Leis do Trabalho. The study found that 4.5 million people suffer from underemployment because they work fewer hours than they want to work.
Worker health is another key factor in the debate. The study found that 500.000 workers took leave in 2024 because they suffered from psychosocial illnesses which developed due to their workplace conditions. The study shows that workplace conditions have caused burnout and work-related stress to become major problems for employees.
The proposal to shorten working hours is currently under discussion in Brazil’s Congress and it might receive a vote before the end of this year. Researchers argue that the country is well positioned to implement the reform because the last working hour reduction took place in the 1980s during a more severe economic downturn which did not increase unemployment.
The dossier contains 37 academic articles that study how a shorter workweek will affect productivity and labor markets and various social groups which include women, young and black workers.