Brazil is currently facing a striking disconnect: while financial markets soar and the economy operates at near full employment, many orthodox economists continue to warn of an imminent fiscal collapse. Stock indices reach historic highs, inflation remains under control, and investors expect a new cycle of interest rate cuts. Yet these same experts — who have been consistently wrong in recent years — insist the country is heading toward a structural crisis.
But how much truth is there behind these warnings?
Beneath the market euphoria lie familiar weaknesses: low productivity, a political system resistant to long-term reforms, and rising public debt. Global capital fleeing U.S. volatility has inflated Brazilian asset prices, creating a temporary sense of strength. Meanwhile, industrial policies, subsidies, and local-content requirements echo past cycles that ended in crisis.
Paradoxically, Brazil is also experiencing a historic boom in infrastructure investment — R$ 760 billion this year alone. The country is not on the verge of collapse, but it is also far from entering a sustained virtuous cycle. To move forward, Brazil must confront deeper structural challenges.
Is Brazil’s Fiscal Deterioration a Threat to Long-Term Growth?
Orthodox economists argue that Brazil’s new fiscal framework is failing despite record investments. They warn that debt could exceed 84% of GDP, interest expenses are rising, and the primary result is sliding back into deficit. To stabilize debt, they claim Brazil would need an adjustment of over 5% of GDP — politically unfeasible under current conditions.
In public debate, social investments are often labeled “wasteful spending.” Specialists in fiscal policy argue the problem is not the size of public spending but its inefficiency. Waste, corruption, and poorly designed programs damage credibility, but strategic public investment in essential sectors is crucial for development. The challenge is separating unproductive expenditures from those that generate long-term growth.
Economists with a developmentalist outlook add another perspective: should a country be forbidden from spending more than it collects? While orthodox thinking says deficits increase risk and raise interest rates, empirical data suggests otherwise. Research by economist Demian Fiocca, for example, shows that Brazil’s real interest rates were higher during years of primary surplus than during fiscal deficits — contradicting the popular belief that austerity improves creditworthiness.
A broader argument emerges: global powers like the U.S. and China have consistently run deficits to finance innovation, industrial capacity, and technological leadership, while promoting austerity for developing economies. Strategic deficits — similar to early-stage investment in startups — can boost innovation and productivity if guided by coherent national planning. Embraer and Embrapa stand as clear examples of successful, state-driven long-term strategy.
Brazil’s Productivity Crisis: The Biggest Threat to Economic Stability
Beyond fiscal debates, Brazil’s real long-term challenge is its chronic productivity stagnation. Investments in research, innovation, education, and infrastructure remain insufficient. Analysts highlight the absence of a national strategy for technology, logistics, scientific development, or workforce training.
Without human capital development, Brazil’s potential growth will continue to shrink.
While financial markets celebrate temporary highs, the nation’s productivity deficit is its true Achilles’ heel. Low productivity undermines competitiveness far more than fiscal turbulence or market volatility.
This weakness stems from decades of underinvestment in critical sectors like science, technology, logistics, energy infrastructure, and especially education. Even in São Paulo, the country’s most advanced region, energy blackouts remain common. Meanwhile, evidence-based educational policy barely appears in public debate.
A striking contradiction persists: policymakers who demand scientific rigor in healthcare, for example, rarely apply the same standards to education, innovation, or economic policy. Without a major breakthrough in human capital, no fiscal rule or industrial incentive will deliver sustained growth.
A Political Debate Dominated by Distractions
While Brazil should be debating its long-term development strategy, productivity agenda, and educational reform, public discourse remains trapped in political distractions. Media cycles revolve around the Bolsonaro family’s future and the fiscal debate’s daily noise.
Brazil’s fiscal difficulties are real, but they are symptoms of a deeper issue: a political and social culture resistant to reforms. Economic elites, in particular, fiercely defend privileges while opposing even modest adjustments — seen recently in the fierce resistance to exempt income tax for workers earning up to R$ 5,000.
This culture creates a fragmented, protectionist, and self-interested society, where any attempt at fiscal reform becomes a prolonged battle of attrition.
Brazil Risks Another Cycle of Stagnation Without Structural Reforms
For now, markets continue to celebrate. But beneath the surface, Brazil is accumulating risks that could trigger a painful correction. Without a strategic shift toward higher productivity, high-quality education, innovation, and responsible fiscal planning, the country risks entering another period of stagnation — or facing a crisis that forces delayed reforms.
Brazil’s future depends on confronting the fundamentals: investing in human capital, strengthening institutions, and abandoning the cycles of fiscal populism and short-termism that have historically held back Latin America’s largest economy.